How To Write A Patent In India: Everything You Need To Know [Expert Tips]

How to write a patent application in India - Intellect Vidhya

A patent is an exclusive right granted to an invention. To obtain a Patent it is very important to write a Patent application clearly by explaining the details of performing the invention. Patent Application is a techno-legal document, so one has to follow the guidelines provided in the Indian Patent act, 1970 and Patent rules, 2003 to write the Patent Application. The drafting of Patent Application plays a vital role in the prosecution process and also after the grant of the Patent this document plays important role in disclosing the invention.

Contents of Patent Application

The Indian Patent act, 1970 under section 10 states that Patent specification should fully and particularly describe the invention and manner in which it has to be performed. The specification or disclosure is the written description of an invention, containing full scientific details of the invention and claims related to the Patent rights. It is very important in the Patent Application to follow the guidelines provided in the Patent law. Patent Application can be filed as provisional specification or as a complete specification.

A provisional specification is filed by the inventor when the invention has attained a stage where the invention can be disclosed in the paper, but it is not reached the final stage. The benefit of filing a provisional application provides a priority date to the invention. There is no need of filing patent claims at the time of filing a provisional specification.

According to section 10 of Indian Patent act, 1970, the content of Patent application (complete specification) should include:

  • Title of the invention.
  • Field of the invention
  • Background of the invention.
  • Object of the invention.
  • Summary of the invention.
  • Detailed description of the invention.
  • Drawings.
  • Best method.
  • Claims.
  • Abstract.


The title of the invention should be very clear and specifically should disclose the subject matter to which the invention relates. The title should be free from any fancy words and the title should not exceed more than 15 words.

Filed of the invention

Filed of the invention should explain the technology to which the invention belongs and it can also explain the purpose and advantage of performing the invention.

Background of the invention

The background of the invention should clearly describe the problem associated in the existing technology, the challenges faced, what are the existing solution, and how to overcome the challenges by using the new invented invention. The most relevant prior art can be explained here to clearly bring out the difference between the novel and inventive concept associated with the existing technology and the invention.

Object of the invention

The object of the invention should explain the problems in existing technology and advantages of performing the invention.

Summary of the invention

In this section the summary of the invention describes the different technical features of the invention.

Detail description of the invention

This section of the Patent specification is very important to clearly explain each and every detail of performing the invention. By writing the clear and crisp detail description, one can easily defend the Patent application during prosecution and the maximum number of objections can be avoided.


To explain the clear picture of the invention drawings are very important. The visuals of performing the invention or different parts of the invention can be easily described in the drawings. The drawings also help in easily explaining each and every detail of the invention in the detail description.

Best method

It is always very crucial to describe the best and easy method of performing the invention. This will lead to defend your invention during prosecution process. The process of explaining inventive concept of the invention can be made possible using the best method available efficiently.


Claims are very important part of the Patent Application as they describe the technical aspects covered by the invention and features to which protection is requested. For writing the claims, a special skill is required because the probability of getting grant of a Patent depends on the writing the proper clear claims in the broadest way possible to seek protection.

There are different types of claims to explain different scope of invention, they are:

Independent claim

Independent claims are the broadest claims. They are stand alone claims and do not require references from any other claims. The independent claim or principal claim should cover all the essential novel features required for performing the invention.

Dependent claim

Dependent claims are always depending on an independent claim or another dependent claim. The features of the dependent claims are always narrower than the claim on which they depend.

Parts of the claim

A Patent claim constitutes three parts:


The preamble of the invention identifies the category and purpose of the invention. That is preamble explains whether the invention is related to a device or an apparatus or a method/process or a composition.

Transitional phrase

It is used to link the preamble of the invention to a different element of the claim. The transitional phrase is of two types.

a. Open-ended transitional phrase: It gives the claim an interpretation of including the stated elements of the invention but not excluding the other elements of the invention.
Example: “Comprising”, “including”, “containing”. Etc.

b. Close-ended phrase: It gives an interpretation of being limited to nothing more than the specifically-recited elements in the claims.
Example: “consisting of”, “consisting essentially of”.

c. The body of the claims:
It explains the invention’s elements and their relationship with each other.

Types of claims based on subject matter:

Process claim

A process claim is used for the process inventions and has to clearly define the steps involved in the process.

Product claim

A product claim may be claimed as an apparatus or a device or a system or any other product.

Composition claim

A composition claim is directed to a composition of matter. For example, a newly synthesized chemical compound or molecule may be claimed as a composition of matter.


Abstract is a brief summary of the invention. The abstract is similar to broadest claim. It describes the technical features of the invention. The abstract should begin with title of the invention and total number of words should not exceed 150 words.

How to write a Design Patent

A design patent protects the design or unique appearance of a manufactured object. A design patent is available to those who invent a new and non-obvious ornamental design for an object. A design patent application contains the below elements:

Abstract or preamble

This section explains the general introduction of the design to be protected.


This is the name given for the new design from the creator.


This section explains the different attributes of the design.


Unlike utility patent claim, the design patent claim has a single claim. The single claim should describe the specific aspect of the design that is novel and unique.

Figures or drawings

It should include at least seven drawings or photographs of the design to be claimed. The drawings or photographs should show all sides of the object design. One of the drawings/photographs should be a three-dimensional image.

Example to explain the structure of a Patent Application:

The Patent act 1970
(39 of 1970)
The Patent rules, 2003
Complete Specification
(See section 10 and Rule 13)


Aqueous solution for cleaning contact lens

Field of invention:

The present invention relates to an aqueous solution for cleaning contact lenses constituting water soluble peroxide, transition metal salts and a surfactant.

Background of the invention:

Lenses must be sterilized to prevent transmission of pathogenic agents onto the eye. Some lens polymers, like hydrogels, cannot be chemically sterilized because they absorb antimicrobial grugs which can cause irritation in eye, so alternative sterilization technique like heat in the form of boiling water or steam are used.

Therefore, it is required to find a simple and efficient method for cleaning contact lenses which will ensure the removal of all soils.

Summary of the invention:

It is an objective of the present invention is to provide a simple, practical, and efficient method for the preparation of an aqueous solution for cleaning contact lens.

Detailed description of the invention:

In general representation of the present invention, an efficient method for the preparation of aqueous solution for cleaning plastic contact lens materials. The solution is a mixture of : a)water-soluble peroxides; b) a water soluble transition metal catalyst in the form organic or inorganic salt; and c) a coco hydrolyzed animal protein anionic surfactant.


We claim:

An aqueous solution for cleaning contact lens which is comprising of:

(i) . a water-soluble peroxide;
(ii). a catalytic amount of a water soluble transition metal catalyst in the form of an organic or inorganic salt;
(iii). a coco-hydrolyzed animal protein anionic surfactant.


The present invention is related to an aqueous solution for cleaning plastic contact lens material wherein the aqueous solution is composed of water-soluble peroxides, a water-soluble transition metal catalyst in the form of organic or inorganic salt and a surfactant.


Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on whatsapp
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on whatsapp

This Post Has 2 Comments

  1. Dr.S.Rama murthy

    Explained well in a simple way.With Examples ,it will be still better.

    1. Vinay Appalla

      Thank you for your suggestion, we will definitely add examples to make it more insightful.

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Micro Copyright in India: Protecting Small-Scale Creative Works

In the digital age, the creation and sharing of content have reached unprecedented heights. With the proliferation of user-generated content, short-form media, and the increasing significance of individual contributions to larger works, the concept of “micro copyright” has emerged. Micro copyright refers to the protection of smaller, often more granular, creative expressions. In the context of Indian copyright law, this concept presents unique challenges and opportunities. This article explores the intricacies of micro copyright and the conundrums surrounding its protection in India. Understanding Micro Copyright Micro copyright encompasses the rights associated with smaller creative works such as social media posts, memes, short videos, gifs, and even individual elements within larger works, like specific phrases or designs. These forms of content, while often brief and seemingly inconsequential, can hold significant value and can be the subject of copyright protection. The Legal Framework of Copyright in India The Indian Copyright Act, 1957, primarily governs copyright protection in India. The Act provides protection to original literary, dramatic, musical, and artistic works, cinematograph films, and sound recordings. For a work to be protected, it must be original and expressed in a tangible form. Challenges in Protecting Micro Copyright 1. Originality and Fixation One of the fundamental requirements for copyright protection is that the work must be original and fixed in a tangible medium. This can be challenging for micro content, where the line between original creation and common expression is often blurred. Determining the originality of a tweet, meme, or short video clip can be subjective and contentious. 2. De Minimis Doctrine The de minimis doctrine, which means “about minimal things,” can pose a significant challenge for micro copyright. This doctrine suggests that the law does not concern itself with trivial matters. Small snippets of content might be considered too insignificant to warrant protection, leaving creators without legal recourse for unauthorized use. 3. Fair Use The concept of fair use allows for limited use of copyrighted material without requiring permission from the rights holders. In the context of micro copyright, determining what constitutes fair use can be particularly tricky. For instance, sharing a meme or a short clip might be considered fair use, but if it goes viral and gains commercial value, the original creator might seek protection and compensation. 4. Enforcement and Attribution Even if micro content is eligible for copyright protection, enforcing these rights can be challenging. Monitoring the vast expanse of the internet for unauthorized use of small-scale content is a daunting task. Additionally, the ease with which digital content can be shared and altered complicates the process of ensuring proper attribution and compensation. The Way Forward 1. Clearer Guidelines and Definitions To address the challenges of micro copyright, clearer guidelines and definitions are needed within the Indian Copyright Act. Defining what constitutes a protectable micro work and setting standards for originality can provide better clarity for creators and users alike. 2. Digital Rights Management (DRM) and Technology Leveraging technology, such as digital rights management (DRM) systems and content recognition algorithms, can help creators monitor and enforce their copyright more effectively. These technologies can automate the process of identifying unauthorized uses and facilitate easier enforcement. 3. Education and Awareness Increasing awareness among creators about their rights and the mechanisms available for protecting their content is crucial. Educational campaigns and resources can empower creators to navigate the complexities of copyright law and safeguard their micro creations. 4. Legal Reform and International Cooperation Given the global nature of digital content, international cooperation and harmonization of copyright laws can play a significant role in addressing the challenges of micro copyright. Legal reforms that consider the unique nature of digital content and micro works can provide a more robust framework for protection. Conclusion The rise of micro copyright in the digital era presents a unique conundrum under Indian copyright law. While the current legal framework provides a foundation for protecting creative works, the nuances of micro content require more specific attention and adaptation. By addressing the challenges of originality, fair use, enforcement, and attribution, and by leveraging technology and education, India can better protect the rights of creators in the evolving landscape of digital content.

Read More »
Importance of Trademarking your Restaurant Name - Intellect Vidhya

Importance of Trademarking your Restaurant Name

Have you ever walked into a restaurant, drawn by its catchy name or eye-catching logo, only to discover that it’s not the establishment you thought it was? In the bustling food and hospitality industry of India, this scenario is becoming increasingly common. As more and more eateries pop up, it’s crucial for restaurant owners to protect their brand’s identity through trademark registration. A trademark is like a unique fingerprint that sets your goods or services apart from the competition. It’s a legal stamp that says, “This is ours, and no one else can use it.” And in the world of restaurants, where first impressions can make or break your business, a strong trademark can be a game-changer. Why Trademarks Matter for Restaurateurs? Success Stories of Trademarked Restaurant Brands The Consequences of Neglecting Trademark Protection In the vibrant culinary landscape of India, trademarking your restaurant brand is more than just a formality – it’s a strategic move that can safeguard your business identity, maintain brand recognition, and provide legal recourse against infringement. By understanding the importance of trademarks and understanding the appropriate registration process under Indian trademark law, you can protect your valuable intellectual property and pave the way for a future as bright as a perfectly cooked dish, fresh out of the kitchen.

Read More »
The Significance Of Prior Use In The Trademark Law Vans V Ivans - Intellect Vidhya

The Significance of Prior Use in the Trademark Law: Vans v. Ivans

In the complex realm of intellectual property rights, few principles hold as much significance as the concept of “prior use” in Indian trademark law. The recent ruling by the Delhi High Court in the Vans v. Ivans case has brought attention to the fundamental concept of giving precedence to the first user of a trademark in the market. The Vans v. Ivans Case: The case centred on a disagreement between Vans Inc., a well-known American footwear and apparel company, and FCB Garment Tex, an Indian company that used the “IVANS” trademark. Vans Inc. filed a request to invalidate FCB Garment Tex’s trademark registration in India, claiming that their “VANS” mark had recently gained recognition as a well-known trademark in the country. Nevertheless, the Delhi High Court ruled in favour of FCB Garment Tex, citing the prior use principle. Important Factors in the Court’s Decision The court’s ruling was influenced by several crucial elements. Firstly, it emphasised that FCB Garment Tex had been using the “IVANS” mark in India for years before Vans Inc. entered the market, applying the “first in the market” principle. Furthermore, the court made it clear that simply declaring a trademark as well-known does not automatically give the owner the authority to cancel other marks that were used earlier in India. Finally, the court determined that FCB Garment’s utilisation of the marks was both sincere and simultaneous, granting them protection under Section 12 of the Trade Marks Act. Supporting the Principle of Prior Use This landmark ruling is a strong affirmation of the prior use principle in Indian trademark law. This principle emphasises that the initial user of a trademark in the market holds greater rights compared to later users, regardless of their registration status. This concept is deeply embedded in the Indian Trade Marks Act, 1999, and aims to safeguard businesses that have dedicated significant time and resources to establish their brand identity in the market. The Reasoning Behind Prior Use There are several reasons behind the prior use principle. It strives to recognise and safeguard businesses that have proactively built their brands in the marketplace. By prioritising the initial user, the law recognises the dedication and resources required to establish a strong brand presence and cultivate customer loyalty. This principle also helps to prevent unfair competition by ensuring that well-known brands are not replaced by new ones with similar marks, thus maintaining consumer trust and market stability. Territorial Nature of Trademark Rights In addition, the principle of prior use acknowledges the territorial nature of trademark rights. The Vans v. Ivans case clearly illustrates that having a worldwide reputation is not enough to establish legal rights in a particular jurisdiction. The principle highlights the significance of establishing a tangible market presence and utilising a trademark within India, rather than solely relying on international recognition or registration in other nations. Engaging with well-known Trademarks The prior use principle also has implications for other aspects of trademark law, including the recognition of well-known trademarks. The ruling by the Delhi High Court provides clarity on the advantages of having a well-known trademark status, while also acknowledging the rights of prior users in the market. This delicate equilibrium ensures the safeguarding of well-known local brands while acknowledging the prestige and recognition of globally renowned trademarks. Practical Considerations for Trademark Owners In practice, trademark owners are faced with a significant burden of maintaining proper documentation of their trademark use due to the prior use principle. This encompasses sales records, advertisements, and proof of customer recognition. Consistent and authentic use of the mark is essential, as any substantial gaps in usage can undermine a prior use claim. Conclusion Ultimately, the verdict of the Delhi High Court in the Vans v. Ivans case serves as a strong affirmation of the prior use principle within Indian trademark law. It emphasises the significance of having a strong market presence and building a reputable brand in order to establish and safeguard trademark rights in India. As the country continues to attract global brands while nurturing its own business ecosystem, this principle will undoubtedly have a significant impact on the development of trademark strategies and dispute resolutions.

Read More »
The Ethical and Legal Dilemma of AI Voice Cloning in the Music Industry - Intellect Vidhya

The Ethical and Legal Dilemma of AI Voice Cloning in the Music Industry

In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has made remarkable progress in various fields, including music production. Voice cloning in music has been a subject of intense debate, raising questions about copyright infringement, moral rights, and the preservation of artistic integrity. The recent criticism voiced by legendary Indian playback singer Kumar Sanu against AI voice duplication brings attention to the mounting concerns within the music industry. Power and Potential of AI Voice Cloning AI voice cloning technology has made significant progress in recreating the voices of singers with outstanding precision. This ability has resulted in the development of new songs that utilise the voices of artists who have passed away, as demonstrated in the recent example of “Pehle Hi Main.” This song was created using an AI-generated voice that mimics the late Mohammed Rafi, who sadly passed away in 1980. Although this technology presents fascinating opportunities for music production and preservation, it also brings up important ethical and legal concerns. Dealing with Copyright Infringement Copyright infringement is a significant legal concern when it comes to AI voice cloning. A singer’s voice is regarded as their valuable asset, safeguarded by copyright laws in numerous jurisdictions. When AI is employed to imitate a singer’s voice without authorization, it may potentially infringe upon copyright protections. This encompasses violations of reproduction rights, distribution rights, and the unauthorised creation of derivative works. Moral Rights and Personality Rights In addition to copyright concerns, AI voice cloning also brings up ethical and legal questions surrounding moral rights and personality rights. It is important for singers to safeguard their work from any alterations or manipulations that may negatively impact their reputation. Additionally, there is a potential for confusion and misrepresentation when AI-generated voices are not explicitly identified. Furthermore, in numerous legal systems, people possess the authority to regulate the commercial exploitation of their identity, appearance, or voice. Voice cloning might be perceived as a violation of these rights. Cloning the Voices of Deceased Artists Using AI to replicate the voices of deceased artists, such as Mohammed Rafi, brings about a whole new set of challenges. Although copyright protection usually lasts for many years after an artist’s passing, the ethical considerations surrounding the use of a deceased artist’s voice without their permission are quite substantial. There are concerns regarding the preservation of the legacy and artistic intentions of deceased musicians. Industry Response Kumar Sanu’s decision to pursue legal protection against AI voice cloning demonstrates a rising recognition of these concerns within the music industry. Other artists and industry professionals are also advocating for the establishment of regulatory frameworks to oversee the utilisation of AI in music production. There are several potential solutions being discussed to address the challenges posed by AI in music. These include establishing licencing protocols for the use of AI-cloned voices, requiring clear disclosure when AI voice cloning is used in a production, and developing specific laws to tackle these unique challenges. The Path Forward As AI technology advances, it is essential for the legal system to stay up to date. Collaboration between the music industry, legislators, and AI developers is crucial in establishing a framework that balances the protection of artists’ rights with the promotion of innovation. This could potentially include the need to revise copyright laws to specifically tackle AI-generated content, setting industry norms for the ethical application of AI in music production, and devising methods for artists to maintain control over and profit from the utilisation of their AI-replicated voices. Conclusion The emergence of AI voice cloning technology brings forth a range of possibilities and complexities for the music industry. Although it presents exciting opportunities for creativity, it also raises serious concerns regarding artists’ rights and the authenticity of their work. As evidenced by Kumar Sanu’s case, it is clear that there is a pressing requirement for the establishment of legal and ethical frameworks to regulate the utilisation of this technology. As we move forward with the more enhanced versions of AI, it’s crucial to find a harmony between technological advancement and safeguarding artists’ rights. It is crucial to establish thoughtful regulation and foster industry cooperation to ensure that AI positively impacts the creative ecosystem of the music industry.

Read More »